Etudes discutant du rôle plus ou moins important et plus ou moins ancien de la maîtrise du feu et de la cuisson au paléolithique
A Cross-cultural Survey of On-site Fire Use by Recent Hunter-gatherers: Implications for Research on Palaeolithic Pyrotechnology
Mc Cauley et al.
Journal of paleolithic archeology, 2020
Perhaps most notably, we found that several groups did not know how to make fire and that even within some of the groups who were able to make fire, the relevant knowledge was restricted to a very small number of individuals. Another surprising finding was that many groups preferred to preserve fire rather than creating it anew, to the point that they would carry it between camps.
Geochemical Evidence for the Control of Fire by Middle Palaeolithic Hominins
Britthingham et al.
these results suggest that the ability of hominins to manipulate fire independent of exploitation of wildfires was spatially variable in the MP and may have developed multiple times in the genus Homo.
Hominin fire use in the Okote member at Koobi Fora, Kenya: New evidence for the old debate
Hlubik et al.
Journal of human evolution, 2019
We present new work on the evidence of fire at the FxJj20 Site complex in Koobi Fora, dated to 1.5 Ma. We highlight evidence of burning found on site through Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometry, and describe ongoing work to investigate the association of hominin behavior and fire evidence.
Amanda G. Henry et al.
Quaternary international, 2018
Here we discuss in detail the various kinds of costs associated with fire and how these costs could, and do, structure human fire-use behavior. We then describe a small experiment to ‘put some numbers on’ the potential costs of fire, by quantifying one of the most expensive costs (fuel collection) and comparing it to one of the most-praised benefits (cooking of food). The results suggest that the costs of fuel collection are very high in less-forested environments, and that excessively large amounts of cooked foods are needed to match the total costs of fuel collection and the act of cooking. Overall, the costs of fire can be quite high and must be considered when proposing models for pre-modern human adoption and regular use of fire technologies.
Were Western European Neandertals Able to Make Fire?
Sarah Hlubik, 2018
Fire for a Reason: Barbecue at Middle Pleistocene Qesem Cave, IsraelRan Barkai, Jordi
Rosell, Ruth Blasco, and Avi Gopher
The university of chicago press journal, 2017
Fire and the Genus Homo: Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 16
Leslie Aiello, 2017
Ethnoarchaeology of Paleolithic Fire: Methodological Considerations
Carolina Mallol and Auréade Henry, 2017
Spatial Analysis of Fire: Archaeological Approach to Recognizing Early Fire
Nira Alperson-Afil, 2017
Fire and the Genus Homo: An Introduction to Supplement 16
Dennis M. Sandgathe and Francesco Berna, 2017
Identifying and Describing Pattern and Process in the Evolution of Hominin Use of Fire
Control of Fire in the Paleolithic: Evaluating the Cooking Hypothesis
Henry de Lumley, 2017 (livre)
The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process
Human Brain Expansion during Evolution Is Independent of Fire Control and Cooking
Alianda M. Cornelio et al.
Frontiers in neurosciences, 2016.
Divergent Ah Receptor Ligand Selectivity during Hominin Evolution
Hubbard et al.
Molecular biology and evolution, 2016
Our findings reveal that a functionally significant change in the AHR occurred uniquely in humans, relative to other primates, that would attenuate the response to many environmental pollutants, including chemicals present in smoke from fire use during cooking.
Melamed et al.
Diet is central for understanding hominin evolution, adaptation, and environmental exploitation, but Paleolithic plant remains are scarce. A unique macrobotanical assemblage of 55 food plant taxa from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel includes seeds, fruits, nuts, vegetables, and plants producing underground storage organs. The food plant remains were part of a diet that also included aquatic and terrestrial fauna. This diverse assemblage, 780,000 y old, reflects a varied plant diet, staple plant foods, environmental knowledge, seasonality, and the use of fire in food processing.
When did humans learn to boil ?
John D. Speth
Obviously, this evidence does not prove that Neanderthals, or earlier hominins, were in fact wet-cooking but, given the simplicity of the technology and the wide availability of suitable container materials, it seems highly likely. Scholars interested in the evolution of human diet and culinary technology need to be aware of this likelihood, and begin to focus their collective efforts on finding innovative ways to “see” wet-cooking in the Paleolithic record.
The importance of carbohydrates in human evolution
The quarterly review of biology, 2015
Here, we argue that plant carbohydrates and meat were both necessary and complementary dietary components in hominin evolution.[…]Although the timing of widespread cooking is not known, Wrangham and Conklin-Brittain (2003) argue that it was long enough ago to allow for biological adaptations to take place, including changes in digestive anatomy around 1.8 million years ago, reduction in tooth size, and reduced capacity for digestion of raw, fibrous foods. They further propose that cooked foods were soft enough to be palatable by infants, potentially leading to earlier weaning and shorter interbirth intervals (also see Carmody et al. 2011)
Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa
Berna et al.
The ability to control fire was a crucial turning point in human evolution, but the question when hominins first developed this ability still remains. Here we show that micromorphological and Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (mFTIR) analyses of intact sediments at the site of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa, provide unambiguous evidence—in the form of burned bone and ashed plant remains—that burning took place in the cave during the early Acheulean occupation, approximately 1.0 Ma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the earliest secure evidence for burning in an archaeological context.
On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe
The timing of the human control of fire is a hotly debated issue, with claims for regular fire use by early hominins in Africa at ∼1.6 million y ago. These claims are not uncontested, but most archaeologists would agree that the colonization of areas outside Africa, especially of regions such as Europe where temperatures at time dropped below freezing, was indeed tied to the use of fire. Our review of the European evidence suggests that early hominins moved into northern latitudes without the habitual use of fire. It was only much later, from ∼300,000 to 400,000 y ago onward, that fire became a significant part of the hominin technological repertoire. It is also from the second half of the Middle Pleistocene onward that we can observe spectacular cases of Neandertal pyrotechnological knowledge in the production of hafting materials. The increase in the number of sites with good evidence of fire throughout the Late Pleistocene shows that European Neandertals had fire management not unlike that documented for Upper Paleolithic groups.
Timing of the appearance of habitual fire use
Dennis Sandgathe et al.
We agree that the evidence indicates thatfire wasnot a requisite technology that allowed Early Pleistocenehominins to expand into more northerly latitudes. However,we argue that the available evidence better supports a signifi-cantly later appearance for the habitual use offire (sometimenear the end of the Late Pleistocene) and that before thisfire,use was always sporadic and opportunistic. Roebroeks andVilla (1) supported their argument by showing, infigure 1 andtable 1 in ref. 1, significant increases in the numbers of siteswith good evidence forfire in the more recent Marine IsotopeStages (MIS), and they adjusted these data to show numbers ofsites with good evidence forfire per 10,000-y increment withineach MIS. A potential problem with these data is that they maysimply be reflecting the overall frequency of sites per time pe-riod. We can expect that, because of ongoing taphonomic pro-cesses, there will necessarily be fewer sites the farther back intime we look. It would be more meaningful if we look at thenumber of site occupations with good evidence forfire relative tothe total number of site occupations known for that specific timeperiod.
The energetic significance of cooking
Journal of human evolution, 2009
cooking has critical effects not easily achievable by non-thermal processing, including the relatively complete gelatinisation of starch, efficient denaturing of proteins, and killing of food borne pathogens. This means that however sophisticated the non-thermal processing methods were, cooking would have conferred incremental energetic benefits. While much remains to be discovered, we conclude that the adoption of cooking would have led to an important rise in energy availability. For this reason, we predict that cooking had substantial evolutionary significance.
Early archaeological sites, hominid remains and traces of fire from Chesowanja, Kenya
Gowlett et al.
Recent investigations of Lower Pleistocene sites at Chesowanja have yielded in situ Oldowan and Oldowan-like stone artefacts, evidence of fire and a fragmentary ‘robust’ australopithecine cranium. Burnt clay found at one artefact locality dated to >1.42±0.07 Myr is the earliest known evidence of fire associated with a hominid occupation site.